| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 7,719
» Latest member: Jessattep
» Forum threads: 9,424
» Forum posts: 62,178
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 1891 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 1887 Guest(s)
Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
after install Linux Lite ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: val
6 hours ago
» Replies: 5
» Views: 94
|
Sem som quando reinicia
Forum: Other
Last Post: di0lh0
7 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 58
|
Problem updating lite 7.6...
Forum: Updates
Last Post: FilippoMo
Yesterday, 03:57 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 315
|
ASUS x206HA black screen ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: Doceal
11-10-2025, 09:25 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 821
|
time synchronization
Forum: Other
Last Post: LL-user
11-09-2025, 12:18 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 173
|
Series to Series Upgrade ...
Forum: Linux Lite Software Development
Last Post: berrywhitetiger
11-07-2025, 05:43 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 4,163
|
Regarding the minimum sys...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: valtam
11-02-2025, 11:41 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 406
|
Can't test LinuxLite 7.6 ...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: valtam
11-02-2025, 05:51 AM
» Replies: 23
» Views: 7,205
|
My worries
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: stevef
11-01-2025, 03:44 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 222
|
nstall Updates - Could n...
Forum: Updates
Last Post: stevef
10-30-2025, 10:21 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 467
|
|
|
| More trouble installing Wine |
|
Posted by: Kevin Perez - 06-09-2021, 01:20 AM - Forum: Installing Software
- Replies (10)
|
 |
Hello Everyone,
I am hoping to eventually install Zello on my computer. In order for this program to work, it requires Wine. I tried following the instructions for installing Wine by: - dpkg --print-architecture
- sudo add-apt-repository 'deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/focal main'
- Received error message: " E: Malformed entry 55 in list file /etc/apt/sources.list (Component)
E: The list of sources could not be read."
- Opened Menu->System->Package Manager
- Enter Password and Press Authenticate
- Received error message: "E: Malformed entry 55 in list file /etc/apt/sources.list (Component)
E: The list of sources could not be read.
E: _cache->open() failed, please report."
- Pressed "Close" button
- Reported all of this to you
Given all this, how may I finally install Wine? What woudl you recommend I do about the error messages. I have already tried using cat /etc/apt/sources.list. It produces:
"# deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal main restricted
# deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-updates main restricted
# deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security main restricted
# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal main restricted
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal main restricted
## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-updates main restricted
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-updates main restricted
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any
## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal universe
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal universe
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-updates universe
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-updates universe
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal multiverse
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal multiverse
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-updates multiverse
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-updates multiverse
## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-backports main restricted universe multiverse
# deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal-backports main restricted universe multiverse
## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu focal partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu focal partner
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security main restricted
# deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security main restricted
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security universe
# deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security multiverse
# deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security multiverse
deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/focal main
# deb-src https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/focal main
deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/ focal main
# deb-src https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/ focal main"
Unfortunately, I am novice enough to be clueless about what this tells me. Perhaps it offers you some clue. Thank you for reading this post. I very much look forward to having Wine (whatever version you recommend) and Zello up and working on this computer. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
|
|
|
| Panel |
|
Posted by: LarryB1607 - 06-05-2021, 04:40 PM - Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Installing updates today totally messes up panel, U last updated around 5/31. My old panel used to have a menu, 5 icons including Firefox and terminal. On the right were a choice of 2 desktops to use. Also a speaker icon with a digital clock. The panel was solid black in color and filled the entire horizontal position. I had it set to auto hide, but now does not. Now I have no background and only a menu icon without the customary 5 icons. There are 5 speaker icons and 2 whisker menu icons, I only added 1 because I wanted a panel shortcut for Firefox. Yet Icons have some transparency even though I have opacity at 100%
|
|
|
|
| Introduction & Issue LL5.4 |
|
Posted by: Patrick Stephens - 06-02-2021, 07:33 AM - Forum: Introductions
- No Replies
|
 |
:002: :computer
Hello fellow Linux users
First I like to say Im very glad to become part of the forum and Im new and starting out with a Linux Lite 5.4, I upgraded from a 5.2 and I stred code class today, Im up to elements and Http .
Im from Syr,Ny now in Bellevue Wa re;oacting a few months now , I ,wanted to get more involved in codeing and develpoment ,which I had no prior exspereince in. Im in Public Health and would like to coordinate an app in that arena, The change came after being a primary caretaker for my Mom for 9 years ,Alzheimers ...She passed in Jan 2021. Now I have to do something different ,and something i know i like to do . Create and make something work ,why not an App?
My learning style is seeing ,replecate and repetition.I also speed read which is not good at times but foundation and key wording are my ways of moving forword in a fast passed environment . Im a Libra ,what can I say :dft001:
:wave
|
|
|
|
| Suggestions for Linux Lite 5.6 (starting from an unfair German review) |
|
Posted by: ludditus - 05-30-2021, 02:21 PM - Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
- Replies (10)
|
 |
Hi, y’all!
I’ve met Linux Lite more than once in the past, yet I didn’t install it, despite it running very well as a live system. Maybe the fact that it’s always based on LTS to have played a role, LTS having its pros and its cons too.
Recently, I got angry at a stupid German review, because I felt it’s so wrong and biased against Linux Lite. The author, Michl Franken, has a site with contents that I consider almost useless and sometimes forced, meaning that it lures people to read the site to find the latest news, somewhat like OMG! Ubuntu! and 9to5Linux, but in German and with more original content. Here’s the culprit: Linux Lite 5.0 – „einfach – schnell – frei“ oder einfach sinnfrei? (Linux Lite 5.0 – “simple – fast – free” or simply pointless?)
The incompetent (you’ll see why I say that) and arrogant (because he posts thousands of nonsensical “articles” for getting traffic, just like the two aforementioned sites) reviewer has opinions that could be translated as follows:
:banghead«Overall, a workable desktop is delivered, but it lacks customization options and fine adjustments for individualization, especially for beginners.»
This is an idiocy. In which way is any other XFCE-based distro more customizable by the beginners?!
:banghead«The firewall configuration can only start, stop or show the status of the firewall. Where is the option to set rules here? Unfortunately, one does not cover oneself with fame here when Linux beginners are supposed to set FW rules via the terminal. GUFW as a helper solves this better.»
The guy is a moron, and I assume what I said. The Settings menu shows two firewall icons: “Firewall (Firewall Configuration)” which starts [tt]firewall-config[/tt] in which everything can be configured, and “Firewall Config (Enable or Disable FirewallD)” which indeed can only start or stop the firewall through [tt]lite-firewallconfig[/tt]. And unfortunately, the Settings Manager window only shows the second one, so the clumsy reviewer thought there’s no other tool available! Pathetic and misleading. Libelous, if you prefer.
:banghead«Linux Lite is an entry-level Linux distribution. But why I should install Linux Lite when I could install Debian, Ubuntu or Xubuntu or another distro with XFCE, unfortunately I do not understand. Don’t get me wrong, the approaches, especially with the documentation, are really very good. But do I have to create a separate Linux distribution for every little idea? I do not think so. Linux Lite undeniably has some very interesting incentives in the Lite Tools. If this could have been integrated into Xubuntu, it would probably have been better for everyone.»
The various Lite Tools, including the Lite Tweaks, are very welcome and a strong selling point, if I can use that verb.
:banghead«In my opinion, this also shows the negative dark side of the Linux land. Smaller distributions are created, some of which also pursue good ideas. But I think it is unlikely that these will ever become more widespread. There are already alternatives here that don’t make mistakes themselves.»
Which alternatives?! Is Xubuntu perfect as it is, or is this about a non-specified Xubuntu derivative? Confusing and void.
:banghead«So I come to the conclusion that Linux Lite is hardly worth recommending. Too few incentives to justify a separate distribution. In other words: What separates Debian and Ubuntu is missing here between Linux Lite and Xbubuntu. Furthermore, it is a mystery to me how this distro can take home 24th place on Distrowatch. Distrowatch is obviously not really representative, but it is a certain indicator.»
Nobody ever said Linux Lite is to Xubuntu what Ubuntu is to Debian! This guy is dishonest. To me, the major advantage and the main purpose of Linux Lite was to offer an out-of-the-box experience that’s familiar to users of Windows or KDE, with polishes and default settings that make a system fully usable right away (in contrast to “The N Things to Do After Installing Xubuntu”)! And, for the most of it, Linux Lite almost managed to achieve its objectives.
I would nonetheless come with my own critics and suggestions of improvement, hoping they’ll be taken for what they are. Some are based on the small customizations I’d do in either of the live session or the installed system, some are more or less bugs, and some are small annoyances.
- I understand the main target are the beginners, but in Desktop Settings, Icons, I’d uncheck “Removable Devices.” You know, Windows and KDE don’t show the mounted devices on the desktop. And it can get cluttered. Many reviewers of XFCE criticize this default setting.
- I’d also increase the icon size from 48 to 50 or better 52, to better accommodate longer labels.
- In Thunar, I’d change the default view to Compact List, in which I’d definitely increase the icon size (zoom in once) so that the icons become blue instead of white. What’s the purpose of an icon theme if the icons aren’t themed in a file manager’s Compact and Detailed modes?
- The handle on the panel is ugly and useless, I’d remove it (right click on it: Window Buttons, Properties, uncheck “Show Handle”).
- The Settings Manager should include icons for both Firewall configuration and enable/disable tools ([tt]firewall-config[/tt] and [tt]lite-firewallconfig[/tt])!
- The Window Manager’s Style has a too small height of the title bar, and this cannot be changed. It’s maybe the only thing that breaks the otherwise nice and consistent theming. Usability can be improved e.g. by using a larger font, but the height of the title bar won’t increase.
- The package [tt]lite-themes[/tt] is actually improperly made, because it conflicts with [tt]adapta-gtk-theme[/tt], without specifically being marked so, therefore trying to install [tt]adapta-gtk-theme[/tt] fails midway. Either the conflicts of LL’s package should properly be updated, or (much better) the themes it includes should be renamed (e.g. Adapta Lite, Adapta-Nokto Lite, etc.) so that the original themes could still be installed.
- The same [tt]lite-themes[/tt] has one more issue: it doesn’t only include the older, more limited set of Microsoft fonts offered by [tt]ttf-mscorefonts-installer[/tt], but also the Win7-Win10 exclusive fonts, which to my knowledge cannot be distributed. It’s not a patent issue, but a copyright one. One fix would be to split it in more packages, so that a [tt]lite-extra-fonts[/tt] would include the legally challenged fonts. Even if preinstalled, this would be much better IMO.
- Unlike other distros using a GTK-based DE, LL doesn’t bother to theme Qt5 apps. Try with a dark theme on something small, e.g. [tt]featherpad[/tt]. The simplest fix (there are many others) would be to install [tt]qt5-gtk2-platformtheme[/tt] and [tt]echo "export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=gtk2" >> ~/.profile[/tt], then logout and log in again. At a distro level, a better choice were to put this in [tt]/etc/skel/.profile[/tt]. (If [tt]qt5ct[/tt] were to be used, its options would be saved in [tt]~/.config/qt5ct/qt5ct.conf[/tt], and in [tt]~/.profile[/tt] should either be nothing, or export [tt]QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=qt5ct[/tt].) Not nice for a beginner to have the need to use a Qt5-based app and not to know how to make it look consistent with the rest of LL, especially with a dark theme.
- The major usability issue in many XFCE themes, and unfortunately in LL too, is the difficulty to resize a window, because of a too thin resize margin. You’ll find here in the forum a question from 2017, still unanswered: “How do I increase the tolerance for window resizing with the mouse? It is difficult with a mouse and even more so with a laptop track-pad.” On Ask Ubuntu, from 2014, but still valid: “How do I increase the resize margin on windows? It takes me about 5 tries to resize a window on my computer. Is there a way to increase the resize margin on the edge of windows?” Most people don’t know they can use Alt+MiddleClick to resize! What I see in LL’s themes is that instead of [tt]metacity-theme-1.xml[/tt], there are [tt]metacity-theme-2.xml[/tt] and [tt]metacity-theme-3.xml[/tt], and that [tt]metacity-theme-3.xml[/tt] sets zero resize margins! (Look under [tt]frame_geometry name="normal"[/tt] for distance names [tt]left_width[/tt], [tt]right_width[/tt], and [tt]bottom_height[/tt].) YMMV, but I cannot see how a null resize margin can be helpful to anyone!
- Suppose one wants to install the [tt]yaru-gtk-theme[/tt] (just the theme, not the icons!), because it’s warmer. Then they’ll notice the LL icon in the Whisker menu has a black background, not a transparent one, and it doesn’t fit aesthetically anymore (this is true for all LL tools in the Settings Manager). In my case, I had to change the panel button icon from [tt]xfce4-whiskermenu[/tt] to [tt]desktop-environment-xfce[/tt].
And now, for an experiment: being based on 20.04 LTS, LL only has XFCE 4.14, not 4.16, thus lacking a few improvements, of which I like Thunar’s ability to pause a file transfer. I can see efforts to bring e.g. a newer [tt]xfce4-weather-plugin[/tt], which doesn’t require a newer XFCE, but I wanted to see if I could get XFCE 4.16 in LL 5.4.
My experiment was to add a PPA that provides XFCE 4.16 to a 20.04 LTS base containing 4.14, then a PPA that provides Warpinator, and a PPA that provides the e-book reader Foliate, and see how everything works!
It worked, and I shortly described the experience on my blog: Quick Experiment in “Improving” Linux Lite. There are some caveats, so it’s not for everyone, and it can obviously break at some point. But I’m using Linux since 1995, so I can’t be scared that easily.
![[Image: FaW8Y6N.png]](https://i.imgur.com/FaW8Y6N.png)
These being said, is there any chance for some of my suggestions to trigger changes in Linux Lite 5.6?
All the best,
Ludditus, long ago known as Béranger
|
|
|
|
| gui menu apps not launching |
|
Posted by: noweare - 05-30-2021, 02:10 AM - Forum: Other
- Replies (5)
|
|
Hello,
Running LL 4.8 but in system is says Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid
which may raise a red flag to someone in the know.
I am finding that some of my gui menu apps are not launching
for example, firewall, gufw, printers.
Don't know what I did but I did upgrade from LL 4.4 to LL 4.8
a little while ago but I don't know if I have used these items after
the upgrade till i just found some are not launching.
But the common thread between the errors i am getting is that some of
the python modules that the intrepreter is looking for are missing like
gi and dbus
I am using Python3.6 is the python version being used for the python scripts.
If any of this sounds familiar I am all ears, otherwise I will spend a couple of days on it
and see if I can figure it out.
Thank in advance
Joe
I know this is not much info but if it sounds familiar I'd be all ears.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
