Posts: 13
Threads: 5
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
0
It would be interesting that when using lite tweaks options, they are already marked and do not have to be ticking every time I run the application ;)
Posts: 541
Threads: 20
Joined: May 2017
Reputation:
0
I respectfully disagree. Having control of my own machine is important to me, and some of those options are clearly marked as "risky." The safe ones, fine, but some of the options shouldn't be done routinely. I think it's brilliant just the way it is.
Posts: 9,112
Threads: 576
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
16
'Interesting' isn't a good enough reason to address this. Folks need to retain the freedom to choose their own options. Thank you all the same for the suggestion.
Posts: 212
Threads: 8
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
It is fine as it is. Yesterday I used it to 'not display the suspend-function' because that does not work right. Great tool and great also the warnings.
Posts: 13
Threads: 5
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
0
Okay, thanks for your answers, sorry if you disturb them with my suggestion, but it was just that, a suggestion. I understand the motives very well. Again, sorry if I offended someone, with my suggestion. :)
Posts: 3,234
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
A middle may be, a button to save preferences, spaced well away from the existing buttons.
The theory being -
if save preferences is never clicked Lite Tweaks will work as it does now.
if 1 item is ticked and save preferences is clicked, on the next run of Lite Tweaks, it will be pre ticked.
If on that second run another item is ticked and save preferences is also clicked, for that run and future runs it pre ticks the 2 items.
eg it permits all numbers of allowable ticks (safe ones) not only 1 or 2.
Where extra rows are ticked and save preferences is not clicked it will run those rows on that instance of Lite tweaks only, thus allowing not safe rows to be ticked and run as usual.
On the next turn if both are unticked and save preferences is clicked it returns to Lite Tweaks as it works now, it's the failsafe/reset method for the preferences and Lite Tweaks.
It would for example be good if it only allows save preferences of rows that are "Safe", acting as a safeguard to stability.
I wouldn't know how to create the code, it could work (the theory) ?
- in safe rows and/nand (and it is ticked, not and it isn't ticked), in the not safe rows exempt from the save preference button it could use NOP, jump (to the next row).
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2017, 08:46 AM by
bitsnpcs.)
Posts: 9,112
Threads: 576
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
16
My brain is already hurting :)
Sent from my Mobile phone using Tapatalk
Posts: 3,234
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
[member=2]Jerry[/member] :)
Posts: 682
Threads: 98
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
0
KISS !!
2006 - HP DC7700p ultraslim Desktop Intel 6300 cpu 4GB Ram LL3.8 64bit.
2007 - Fujitsu Siemens V3405 Laptop 2 GB Ram LL3.6 32bit. Now 32bit Debian 9 + nonfree.
2006 - Fujitsu Siemens Si1520 Laptop Intel T720 cpu 3GB Ram LL5.6 64 Bit
2014 - Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook E754 Intel i7 4712MQ 16GB Ram LL6.6
2003 - RETIRED Toshiba Satellite Pro A10 1 GB RAM LL2.8 32bit