Posts: 117
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
0
Beside the usage of the same desktop environment, what is basically the main difference between Linux Lite and Xubuntu? In what way does Linux Lite differ from let's say Mint Xfce, Xubuntu and other Debian/Ubuntu derivatives using Xfce?
My laptop:
MSI GE70-2PE*Quad core Intel Core i7-4710HQ*Kingston 16 GB RAM*Intel 4th Gen. Integr. GPU/NVidia GeForce GTX860M*Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2200/Intel Wireless 3160
I don't need Google, my wife knows everything!
My Linux website
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016, 04:41 PM by
nomko.)
Posts: 117
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
0
I've seen his response, but just adding a bit more than the distro you derive from to have a better support or working system out-of-the-box doesn't create a brand new linux distro. When i set up Xubuntu with everything working out of the box, change the default theme and icon set to the one Linux Lite is using i have basically the same distro but without any extra repositorirs to turn Xubuntu into Linux Lite.
IMHO, any distro using an existing distro to derive from doesn't add anything new to the Linux world.
My laptop:
MSI GE70-2PE*Quad core Intel Core i7-4710HQ*Kingston 16 GB RAM*Intel 4th Gen. Integr. GPU/NVidia GeForce GTX860M*Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2200/Intel Wireless 3160
I don't need Google, my wife knows everything!
My Linux website
Posts: 530
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
Perhaps you should drive it around the block a few times and get a feel for what it actually is. :)
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Posts: 1,255
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
Never Mind.
Happy Trailz, Rok
LL 3.6,2.8
Dell XT2 > Touchscreen Laptop
Dell 755 > Desktop
Acer 150 > Desktop
I am who I am. Your approval is not needed.
(This post was last modified: 01-23-2016, 04:19 PM by
rokytnji.)
Posts: 9,113
Threads: 577
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
16
Specifics aside, it boils down to choice. Some are pro-choice in the linux world, some are not. This is a good thing. I get asked this question everytime I do an interview online. I certainly won't get into an us vs them discussion. It's one better left to the users to point out the differences, why they chose one over the other. This becomes the difference in the end :)
Posts: 117
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
0
Ofcourse it's all about choice, but can you call it a choice if you only have a few major desktop environments and dozens of desktop themes based on those few desktop environments and after changing the main theme call it another distro? That's not a choice, that's merely posting your own theme of a major desktop environment. Ofcourse i agree with you, it's all about choices.
So, for now... my daughter is going to test Linux Lite for me :D
My laptop:
MSI GE70-2PE*Quad core Intel Core i7-4710HQ*Kingston 16 GB RAM*Intel 4th Gen. Integr. GPU/NVidia GeForce GTX860M*Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2200/Intel Wireless 3160
I don't need Google, my wife knows everything!
My Linux website
Posts: 1,149
Threads: 22
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
Hello!
No one Linux distro can be everything to everyone. Those that try to be don't seem to last long.
Since you've been using Mint, you might want to try Pepperrmint. its minimalistic approach will make it easier to make it into something more suitable for you.
Linux Lite is designed to minimize the 'learning curve' for users transitioning from Windows to Linux, while using less CPU/RAM resources than Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu to do so. Sure, there are versions of Linux that use even fewer resources than LL - at the price of a considerably higher learning curve. Seems that their level of difficulty is inversely proportional to how fast they are...
73 DE N4RPS
Rob
A gun in your hand is worth more than a whole police force on the phone.