[valtam]

Contact: Maintainer: Kende Krisztián <[email protected]>

[elelme]

Paul1149, I will look into Clonezilla, and Supergamer, I will ponder your answer and suss something out. Thanks so much for taking the time to respond, fellows!


Now, JERRY, I have written Kende Krisztian and heaped praise, respectfully.
Thanks for that email address.

Who knows what will happen?  I know there are many folks on other forums that have recommended
this Systemback, too.


And in trying to make a tar of my system, I might have invented a perpetual motion machine... :o
it was still trying to make after 3 hours and the size was nearing 15 gigs. I finally stopped it,
as I had no idea how much longer it might take; I simply needed my rest.

[elelme]

Okay, haven't been impressed with suggestions for a Systemback replacement so far.
And, as stated elsewhere, it looks like Systemback may be dormant.

So here is where I am with this...( And not wishing to mark this quest ABANDONED quite yet. )

I can use the Backups a/k/a Deja Dup (?) in lieu of restore points, I think ?
And then what I need is to have a program that can make a simple bootable ISO from my current install, including my personal data and settings. It's probably out there, and I just have not come
across it. Is there such a program out there?
If not, I will quit beating this dead horse, as someone here said. My apologies.

[justme2]

I am saddened that SystemBack may die. Until the announcement was made, I had never used it so I determindly made an ISO of my system and created a bootable DVD. Wow what a useful (and fast) utility it is! If as often happens, I mess up, I would no longer have to go through the reinstall/reconfigure everything process; just reinstall from the DVD. So surely this utility would be part of every linux users armoury, I thought. Should this or something like it be part of every linux distribution, especially now that users are being weaned from windoze, users who want a simple recovery system without the complexities of command line. I don't know what the developer has in mind but there must be other skilled developers in the linux community who could take on this task. Unfortunately I don't have the skills so must rely on more able people. 

[elelme]

Thanks for weighing in, justme2! I realize everyone busy with other projects,
but this systemback situation has been a bother to me. Attempting to learn
clonezilla, but doesn't seem to be so efficient. Also, many programs similar
to systemback are either dormant or called "unstable" by Synaptic description.
I am sure someone will do something, but when is the question... 
I love Linux Lite AND systemback, so I guess I like to have my cake and eat
it too.

Addendum: Clonezilla is a bust. Would have to buy a new USB Backup Drive to use
it, it looked like. Sorry.

[rijnsma]

Very good solution Systemback.
I use it all the time to make a bootable ISO of the system to be able for instance to put a system on usb.
The 'snapshots' or 'restore-points' are also very helpfull, although slow.
I use Clonezilla too, very good and reliable, but it produces not a bootable live-medium of course.
What is the matter with developers of these apps? One becomes very famous with this kind of software...!
Don't sign off please..?! mile:

[trinidad]

Many specialized applications are disappearing by name from Ubuntu nowadays quite simply because Ubuntu is assimilating them into Ubuntu itself. I'm sure UCK has a lot to do with the disappearance of support for systemback. Remmina may be the next casualty of the canonical spaghetti monster. There is still no support for it in Deb 9. Remastersys was great back in the day but now even Pinguy seems to have disappeared. It is interesting to me the flood gate seems to have opened when Deb 9 went stable. New apps appeared in a flood when Deb 8 went stable and old apps seem to be losing support now that Deb 9 is stable. There are major differences between Deb 8 and 9, and developers on a shoestring can have a tough go at it. I had my own mysterious dance with the db change at first. I find myself using Ubuntu more and more every day, something I never did at all three years ago. Linux Lite 2.8 was the first Ubuntu based distro I ever used aside from a brief fling after Suse with Kubuntu 12.04. Basically went from Suse to Debian. Now I've begun using Ubuntu for everything I can. Simpler, usually faster, and much more flexible than Deb stable for a lot of things. Still learning every day even though I'm almost as old as dirt.

TC

[DenW]

This is my first post to LL forums but I have been following the many interesting threads for a while.

Yes Systemback has ceased development but there are threads elsewhere on these forums when you were discussing possible backup options.
I now use Timeshift  http://www.teejeetech.in/p/timeshift.html for backup of complete system (minus user files e.g. documents, pictures, music) plus Backintime or Grsync for /home including user files (these programs are in the current repositories and do not compress files like Deja Dup (LL Backups)).

When you upgrade LL to Version 4 using Ubuntu 17.04 you will have a choice to make if Systemback is not updated.

Love the ease of use of LL for new users compared to most "user friendly" distros like Peppermint, Linux Mint and MX-16 which I also use regularly.  You make things really easy with Install Updates, Lite Tweaks, Lite Software and the Help Manual.  Would always recommend LL as first distro for new user.

[valtam]

If Systemback is not supported in 18.04 base, we will go with another application.

Sent from my Mobile phone using Tapatalk