| 
		
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		
Hi,
 
Probably one for the dev's..?? 
A friends ask me to look at putting together a "Mini i7 PC " bare bones with LL on it. 
((It's new, only 4 review's, 3 are running Linux on it.))
 
It's got 2 X mSATA slots, and he asked if it's possible to do a "RAID 0" set-up on them, 
for improved throughput, but at the loss of redundancy. So put the OS across 2 X 120GB SSD's
	 
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  Computers Early days: 
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,255 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Aug 2014
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Would that not be op to the bios more than the operating system wirezfree?
	 
LL 3.6,2.8Dell XT2 > Touchscreen Laptop
 Dell 755 > Desktop
 Acer 150 > Desktop
 I am who I am. Your approval is not needed.
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
		
		
		10-08-2015, 11:11 PM 
(This post was last modified: 10-08-2015, 11:16 PM by Wirezfree.)
		
	 
		Yes, you can have H/W based raid controllers, but also Software based. 
In Windows it was possible in Software, it was added from XP Pro on, depending on version.
 
EDIT.. 
Just found this on "Ubuntu Software Raid " 
Quick read seems to indicate a "Alternate Install".. need to read more
	
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  Computers Early days: 
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,255 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Aug 2014
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Well, if looking for a software raid solution, instead of a hardware raid solution. 
You get to pick the search term.
http://www.googlubuntu.com/ 
Good Luck.
	
LL 3.6,2.8Dell XT2 > Touchscreen Laptop
 Dell 755 > Desktop
 Acer 150 > Desktop
 I am who I am. Your approval is not needed.
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Thanks... 
Found a couple of things, but they are on Mint RAID 0  & MINT RAID 1  need to read a few times... seems a little techy
	
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  Computers Early days: 
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,849 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Sep 2015
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
		
		
		10-09-2015, 12:49 AM 
(This post was last modified: 10-09-2015, 01:01 AM by firenice03.)
		
	 
		If looking to RAID, I've always heard hardware RAIDs were preferred over software - now sure software has come along way and maybe the hardware doesn't support it in the set up....  
If an OS level RAID for a workstation, wouldn't there be concern if the OS went corrupt??? Just thinking out loud.. 
Defiantly intriguing though    
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
 LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
 LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
 BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
 Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		@firenice03 ,
 
Yes, there are risks... Certain types of RAID allow you to have disk failures, 
then when you replace the disk, it re-builds the array itself based on content on remaining disks. 
Normally RAID is used in Servers. 
I think it was curiosity because it's unusual to have multiple mSata slots in such a small PC.
 
There are H/W devices that allow you to build a RAID device from 2 X mSata cards 
that then fit in a single 2.5" slot, but they have mixed reviews... 
Like this one 2 X mSata Adapter
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  Computers Early days: 
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,849 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Sep 2015
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		Thanks Wirezfree  (10-09-2015, 07:51 AM)Wirezfree link Wrote:  @firenice03,
 Yes, there are risks... Certain types of RAID allow you to have disk failures,
 then when you replace the disk, it re-builds the array itself based on content on remaining disks.
 Normally RAID is used in Servers.
 I think it was curiosity because it's unusual to have multiple mSata slots in such a small PC.
 
 
 
 There are H/W devices that allow you to build a RAID device from 2 X mSata cards
 that then fit in a single 2.5" slot, but they have mixed reviews...
 Like this one 2 X mSata Adapter
 
That adapter is cool... Back in the day I RAID'ed (lol)  a workstation, but just for storage the OS was on a separate disk for that reason... I'm curious how well it works..  
I've thought about a Windows server with drives in a RAID mostly for storage and redundancy (pictures), then debated a NAS (FreeNAS is pretty slick) but hey if LL can pull it off too    ...
	
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
 LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
 LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
 BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
 Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,484 
	Threads: 96 
	Joined: Mar 2014
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		I have been reading some of the stuff on setting up RAID...I got a headache, seems like luck if you get it working, very mixed results.
 I think I will suggest he thinks about normal install...
 To be honest I'm not sure how much improvement it will give over just using single SSD disk.??
 
 Yes, that dual mSATA H/W raid looks interesting
 But @ $220 for 2 X mSATA(120GB) and the mSATA Card,
 It could prove to be an expensive experiment....
 
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks  Computers Early days: 
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) ,  BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,849 
	Threads: 21 
	Joined: Sep 2015
	
 Reputation: 
0 
	
	
		I hear ya,  especially when you start looking at the differences, the gains and then the one offs...   (10-09-2015, 06:30 PM)Wirezfree link Wrote:  But @ $220 for 2 X mSATA(120GB) and the mSATA Card,It could prove to be an expensive experiment....
 Isn't that just about everything     lol
	
LL4.8 UEFI 64 bit ASUS E402W - AMD E2 (Quad) 1.5Ghz  - 4GB - AMD Mullins Radeon R2LL5.8 UEFI 64 bit Test UEFI Kangaroo (Mobile Desktop) - Atom X5-Z8500 1.44Ghz - 2GB - Intel HD Graphics
 LL4.8 64 bit HP 6005- AMD Phenom II X2 - 8GB - AMD/ATI RS880 (HD4200)
 LL3.8 32 bit Dell Inspiron Mini - Atom N270 1.6Ghz - 1GB - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express  -- Shelved
 BACK LL5.8 64 bit Dell Optiplex 160 (Thin) - Atom 230 1.6Ghz - 4GB-SiS 771/671 PCIE VGA - Print Server
 Running Linux Lite since LL2.2
 |